
File duplicates can appear larger despite containing identical primary data due to variations in associated file details. This occurs when the duplicate copy incorporates extra embedded information (metadata), uses less efficient saving settings, or incurs minor corruption during copying. Even minor adjustments like timestamps, author fields, or software-specific data can inflate the file size compared to an otherwise identical original.
For example, saving a JPEG photograph with higher "Quality" settings during duplication increases its file size due to more retained image detail. Similarly, emailing a document as an attachment might automatically add hidden encoding information or formatting instructions compared to saving the same file directly from an office suite, causing the attachment duplicate to be larger.

This size inflation is generally wasteful, consuming extra storage without delivering meaningful additional content. While occasionally useful for preserving editing history unintentionally, frequent size mismatches complicate accurate deduplication efforts and storage management. Users should verify duplicate integrity with checksums to ensure functional equivalence beyond size alone.
Why are duplicates sometimes larger in size?
File duplicates can appear larger despite containing identical primary data due to variations in associated file details. This occurs when the duplicate copy incorporates extra embedded information (metadata), uses less efficient saving settings, or incurs minor corruption during copying. Even minor adjustments like timestamps, author fields, or software-specific data can inflate the file size compared to an otherwise identical original.
For example, saving a JPEG photograph with higher "Quality" settings during duplication increases its file size due to more retained image detail. Similarly, emailing a document as an attachment might automatically add hidden encoding information or formatting instructions compared to saving the same file directly from an office suite, causing the attachment duplicate to be larger.

This size inflation is generally wasteful, consuming extra storage without delivering meaningful additional content. While occasionally useful for preserving editing history unintentionally, frequent size mismatches complicate accurate deduplication efforts and storage management. Users should verify duplicate integrity with checksums to ensure functional equivalence beyond size alone.
Quick Article Links
Can similar but not identical files be flagged as duplicates?
Similar but not identical files typically wouldn't be flagged as exact duplicates by standard duplicate detection tools,...
What is Windows Search Index and how does it work?
Windows Search Index is a background system that creates a catalog of the words and properties within your files and app...
Why do some search results show outdated file paths?
Search results sometimes display outdated file paths due to delays in how search engines index and update website change...