Can I rename test result files by test name?

Renaming test result files by test name means customizing test output file names using the actual names of the test cases executed, rather than accepting generic or timestamp-based default filenames. This is achievable by configuring your test automation framework to leverage the specific test's identifier as part of the output filename during test execution. For example, instead of a file named results_20231024.xml, you can generate Login_Test_results.xml or Checkout_Flow_results.json, significantly improving clarity. This differs from default naming, which typically lacks context beyond execution time or sequence.

WisFile FAQ Image

Practical applications are common in continuous integration (CI) pipelines and daily development. Tools like pytest (with plugins) and JUnit (via test runner configuration) allow generating individual XML/HTML reports named after test suites or cases. Similarly, UI testing frameworks like Cypress or Selenium Grid integrations can name screenshot/video artifacts captured on failure using the failed test's name, making it instantly clear which visual corresponds to which broken scenario.

The key advantage is drastically improved traceability and debuggability, as developers can immediately locate results relevant to a specific test failure. However, limitations include ensuring test names are filesystem-safe (avoiding special characters, excessive length) and managing potential naming collisions in parallel test execution. Careful implementation avoids these issues, streamlining the diagnosis of test failures and improving workflow efficiency. Future IDE/test runner integrations may offer more seamless setup for this capability.

Can I rename test result files by test name?

Renaming test result files by test name means customizing test output file names using the actual names of the test cases executed, rather than accepting generic or timestamp-based default filenames. This is achievable by configuring your test automation framework to leverage the specific test's identifier as part of the output filename during test execution. For example, instead of a file named results_20231024.xml, you can generate Login_Test_results.xml or Checkout_Flow_results.json, significantly improving clarity. This differs from default naming, which typically lacks context beyond execution time or sequence.

WisFile FAQ Image

Practical applications are common in continuous integration (CI) pipelines and daily development. Tools like pytest (with plugins) and JUnit (via test runner configuration) allow generating individual XML/HTML reports named after test suites or cases. Similarly, UI testing frameworks like Cypress or Selenium Grid integrations can name screenshot/video artifacts captured on failure using the failed test's name, making it instantly clear which visual corresponds to which broken scenario.

The key advantage is drastically improved traceability and debuggability, as developers can immediately locate results relevant to a specific test failure. However, limitations include ensuring test names are filesystem-safe (avoiding special characters, excessive length) and managing potential naming collisions in parallel test execution. Careful implementation avoids these issues, streamlining the diagnosis of test failures and improving workflow efficiency. Future IDE/test runner integrations may offer more seamless setup for this capability.